SMEG is therapy documentation risk intelligence for skilled nursing facilities — a clinician-led, AI-assisted review service that screens PT, OT, and SLP notes for payer, audit-readiness, and revenue-protection concerns.
Pt sn 30 min PT focusing on R shoulder ROM post-op rotator cuff repair. AROM: flex 95°, abd 80°. PROM tolerated to 110° flex. Tol Tx well. Will continue plan.
Initial OT eval. Pt presents s/p stroke with R UE weakness. AROM measured. ADL performance assessed. Plan: 5×/wk OT ×4 weeks for ADL retraining and UE strengthening.
Pt sn 30 min ST for dysphagia. Trialed nectar-thick liquids w/ chin tuck — 0/10 overt s/sx aspiration. Reinforced swallow strategies w/ pt and CNA. Continue per POC.
Demo findings are based on synthetic note examples with no real PHI. They illustrate SMEG’s documentation-risk review logic only.
SMEG helps SNF leaders see payer, audit-readiness, and revenue-risk themes across PT, OT, and SLP documentation before those themes become payer-review pressure or leadership surprises.
Therapy documentation can become a review target. SMEG helps leadership see repeat-risk patterns before they become harder to address.
No public one-size-fits-all price. SMEG scopes pricing after we understand skilled beds, review volume, and support needs.
OIG and CMS materials repeatedly flag SNF and therapy documentation as high-scrutiny areas. SMEG translates those concerns into plain-language review priorities.
SMEG turns documentation risk into leadership-ready risk intelligence.
Source detail is available during the scope conversation. Public examples are directional and not a guarantee of savings, reimbursement, or denial reduction.
A plain-English learning page explains SNF therapy documentation risk, Medicare Part A vs Part B, PDPM, MDS, ADRs, and the safe claim boundaries behind SMEG’s review model.
Understand coverage-support risk versus billing-support risk.
See how therapy documentation supports the resident care story.
Learn what makes notes look weak under payer review.
Use CMS and OIG resources to study the Medicare/SNF context.
SMEG does not replace your EHR, therapist judgment, MDS team, compliance officer, or payer-policy review. It creates a clearer risk-intelligence layer over therapy documentation so leadership knows what to review first.
Skilled need, daily skilled rationale, progress toward goals, and coverage-support themes that may need leadership review.
Documentation patterns that may not clearly support the assessment, diagnosis, or payment-story being carried forward.
Individual, concurrent, group, minutes, and treatment-mode documentation themes that can create review exposure.
Time, units, KX-threshold context, medical-necessity language, and treatment-to-goal support concerns.
Medicare, managed care, and facility-policy patterns organized into plain-language review priorities.
Cross-discipline trends, repeat issue themes, and practical next steps for DOR, administrator, compliance, and finance conversations.
For demo/pilot use, submit fake data or approved secure-intake files only. SMEG can review PT, OT, and SLP documentation samples across common visit types.
SMEG screens major CMS/Medicare/MDS/PDPM/therapy billing/skilled-need/documentation-integrity risk areas, then routes findings for clinician-led review.
You get risk grades, patterns, examples, and recommended review priorities in a report leadership can actually discuss.
DOR, administrator, compliance, and finance leaders each get a practical view of documentation-risk patterns backed by the same clinician-led review workflow.
Five layers, one clearer review process. See how a documentation sample becomes an action-oriented risk report for leadership discussion.
PDF upload, paste-text, approved secure export, or shared intake workflow. SMEG can start with fake data or CSV/PDF samples while enterprise integrations are scoped separately.
SMEG screens for major CMS, Medicare, MDS, PDPM, therapy billing, skilled-need, and documentation-integrity risk areas, then separates source-backed findings from human-review prompts.
Notes receive a Documentation Risk Score with red/yellow/green bands. Leadership sees high-priority documentation-risk patterns, plain-language examples, and practical next steps for clinician/compliance review.
Every finding becomes an action priority with owner, severity, and suggested next step. Snippet-only context supports PHI minimization. Outputs are clear HTML/PDF reports for leadership discussion.
Pt sn 45 min OT, R shoulder ROM. AROM flex 95°, abd 80°. Tol Tx well. Will continue per plan.
During pilot/service delivery, high-risk patterns can be reviewed by Deshaun and the SMEG clinical team. Buyers get a clinician-led interpretation, not just a generic software flag.
Clear review priorities for SNF therapy documentation — written for facility leaders, not buried in technical citations.
PT, OT, and SLP notes can be reviewed together so patterns are easier to explain across the facility.
Each reviewed note can receive a red/yellow/green documentation-risk score with plain-language reasons and reviewer next steps.
SMEG quickly flags likely documentation concerns, then clinician-led review confirms what should be shared.
"I've spent 10 years pulling notes for audits. SMEG is the tool I wish I'd had on day one."
Start with a defined facility-size and skilled-bed-count conversation. SMEG will recommend the appropriate review threshold, scope, and intake path before any PHI is submitted.
smeg@suprememedicalevaluationgroup.com · (818) 468-4099